Lone Star Ball: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Holy War Week Brings out the Worst in Fans

More on the MVPs

Phil Pepe defends the Justin Morneau selection, with the standard reasoning:

I believe fervently in the literal definition of the term "Most Valuable." The award was designed to go not to the year's outstanding player, but rather to the one most instrumental in the success of his team (the fact that both Morneau's Twins and Jeter's Yankees failed to get past the first round of the playoffs had no bearing on the vote; ballots had to be submitted before the first pitch of the first playoff game). It is rare that a player's value is so clearly apparent as Morneau's was this season. Just look at the numbers:

On June 7, the Twins were 25-33, 11 ½ games behind the Tigers in the AL Central and Morneau was batting .236 with 11 home runs and 38 runs batted in. From June 8 to the end of the season, Morneau batted .362 with 23 homers and 92 RBIs, and the Twins went 71-33, passed the Tigers and won the division championship. That, to me, is the definition of a Most Valuable Player. How much clearer can it be?

Of course, from June 8 on, Johan Santana went 14-2, pitching 150 innings, with a 2.52 ERA.  From June 8 on, Torii Hunter hit 22 homers and played excellent defense in centerfield.  From June 8 on, Joe Mauer hit about .330 and was great defensively behind the plate.  See how easy the "from June 8 on" game is?

And of course, it is ridiculous to pick an arbitrary point of the season, say that everything before that date doesn't count, and select a winner based on who performs the best from that point on.  It is a cliche, but a win in April counts just as much as a win in September, and Morneau's lousy play up to that point is part of the reason that the Twins had to make up so much ground.  To say he's most valuable because he started hitting the same time the Twins started winning is to engage in a post hoc fallacy that cheapens the award.

Of course, Pepe's argument is more legitimate than Stephen A. Smith's claim that Ryan Howard deserved the MVP because he's African-American:

The result of the voting for the National League's most valuable player is expected tomorrow and, with apologies and respect to Albert Pujols, the vote shouldn't even be close. Of course, there are naysayers who'll spew otherwise, vociferously pointing out how the league's 2005 MVP still had 49 homers with a better batting average and slugging percentage than Howard - despite missing 15 games in June because of an injury.

They'll be the same people I accuse of not paying much attention last season.

You don't just look at the stat sheets or the box scores to measure the impact of Ryan Howard. You view the landscape of MLB then ask yourself, "Where did these fans come from?"

Who are all these people who weren't watching the Phillies before? This franchise hasn't made the postseason since 1993, so why on earth are stadiums packed whenever they come to town?

Where did all the African American fans come from? Why haven't we heard about steroids? Mark McGwire? Barry Bonds?

The answer would be because there's no need. Because Howard is the real deal. He's the modern-day athlete major-league baseball was starving for.

"I care about winning," Howard told me several weeks ago, right before he left town to smack homers all over Japan. "I care about winning and doing it the way it's supposed to be done. Everyone wants to get paid, to be successful. But sometimes it's as much about how you do things as well as what you do. I know that. I'm aware of that."

The same can be said of Pujols, who is as big-time as they come. The St. Louis Cardinals would not have sniffed the postseason without him, let alone captured a World Series championship. But the reality is the talent that is Pujols, while fairly unique, is a dime a dozen in the laundry list of Latin talent that has invaded baseball.

When you think of Pujols, you also think of Manny Ramirez and David "Big Papi" Ortiz or Alex Rodriguez. They play great baseball, but that's it.

In Howard's case, not only has he performed, he's single-handedly transformed the focus of a sport, forcing baseball - and possibly the rest of us - to take a closer look at potential African American prospects perhaps through something more than Reviving Baseball in the Inner City (RBI) programs.

Held back - some might say hidden - by the Phillies for far too long, Howard has burst onto the scene in less than two years in the majors. And he's done it with a Magic Johnson-like smile despite the Phillies' unwillingness to show him some money and his being surrounded by limited, wannabe talent.

The Phillies are looking for help, we hear, supposedly in the form of a power hitter like Alfonso Soriano or Carlos Lee to protect Howard. We'll wait to see if that actually happens. We'll also wait to see if they acquire a quality starting pitcher and some bullpen help for Tom Gordon.

Meanwhile, we'll pray they get rid of Pat Burrell and his $27 million over the next two years for a leftfielder who actually looks interested in playing 150 to 162 games a year.

So there you go...Howard deserves the MVP instead of Pujols because he's black, and Pujols is Hispanic.  Oh, and Howard seemingly -- from what Smith says -- had to fight past the Phillies' desire to keep him from succeeding.

0 recs  |  Comment 14 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Wow,
congrats to Howard for "single-handedly" transforming the focus of the sport.  He should also win the Nobel Peace Prize.

One part you didn't paste was how "Pujols deservedly got the award last year" and it's Howard's time now.  What does last year have to do with the MVP award?  

by t ball on Nov 27, 2006 12:58 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

not to take anything away
from your post but FJM has a nice write up of the Smith article:

http://firejoemorgan.blogspot.com/2006/11/introducing-dr-frank-quietly.html

made me chuckle

by ab03 on Nov 27, 2006 1:07 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Classic Stephen A material
I like how he says that Hispanics "invaded" baseball. Sounds so ominous. And racist. Black people "invaded" my suburb. Koreans "invaded" my neighborhood. So Pujols shouldn't have won because there are too many Hispanics in baseball? Under that rationale, Matsui should have won. I don't care if he was injured most of the year, there aren't many Asians playing in the majors.

As far as saying that Hispanics play great baseball "but that's it," I don't know what to say. Given it's their job is to play baseball, I'm not sure what else they need to do.

Fire Buck, DFA everyone, burn down the stadium.

by WyoRanger on Nov 27, 2006 1:14 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

NBA comparison
So by SA Smith's logic, Steve Nash deserves to win the NBA MVP every year.  Black athletes in the NBA are a "dime a dozen" and a white athlete of Nash's caliber can "single-handedly transform the focus of a sport, forcing" basketball "- and possibly the rest of us - to take a closer look at potential" Caucasion" American prospects.

Yeah ... that makes no sense.  Race should have nothing to do with the MVP voting.  It's just a silly award not affirmative action.

Derek

Signature! I don't need no stinking signature!!

by DerekSTheRed on Nov 27, 2006 1:23 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Whoops
I forgot that Nash is Canadian and not Caucasian-American.  That must be why he got his second MVP.  The first one for being white and the second for being Canadian.  At least according to SA Smith's logic that is.  It probably didn't have anything to do with the fact that he and Howard are really good.

Derek

Signature! I don't need no stinking signature!!

by DerekSTheRed on Nov 27, 2006 2:27 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Wow
what a great post you nailed it.
"Stubbornness is usually considered a negative, but I think that trait has been a positive for me." ~ Cal Ripken Jr

by kwellborn on Nov 27, 2006 8:34 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Alrighty
Pujols is well on his way to being the next Gehrig.  Dime-a-dozen my ass.

Also, attendance in Philly was up only 450 per game over last year and was about 6,800 per game under 2004, when the new park opened.  Oh, those pesky facts.

Interesting aside:  Pujols is two months younger than Howard (assuming Pujols's age is not fabricated).

by Lucas on Nov 27, 2006 1:28 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

You didn't know?
That the MVP is usually decided by race every year?  I thought we all knew that. I mean Bonds didn't put up great numbers, he won because he was black. Peyton Manning didn't win the MVP being good, he was white. Same goes for Steve Nash.

Allowing MVPs to be decided by race is the only way to keep the man from holding disadvantaged races down.

Thank you Stephen A. for your insightful view on sports. And to think I almost thought Ryan Howard won the MVP because he was damn good, not because of his race. What was I thinking?

why don't teams not called the Red Sox or Yankees just close-up, burn down the stadium, and then as a group jump off a cliff

by texasbuckeye on Nov 27, 2006 1:48 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

my fav part was:
"Held back - some might say hidden - by the Phillies for far too long, Howard has burst onto the scene in less than two years in the majors. And he's done it with a Magic Johnson-like smile despite the Phillies' unwillingness to show him some money and his being surrounded by limited, wannabe talent."

since of course its not like the phillies had a pretty damn good 1B before howard (thome) and as for the "wannabe" talent i wonder if howard feels the same way? and i wonder if chase utley considers himself "limited" lol

go back to basketball steven a.

btw the post abt nash i found pretty funny.

dirk for MVP! not because he is good, but because he is german! LOL

"the league's 2005 MVP still had 49 homers with a better batting average and slugging percentage than Howard - despite missing 15 games in June because of an injury"

which is pretty damn impressive. if your starting a team today i think you HAVE to take pujols over howard. i would in a heartbeat

by knockoutking24 on Nov 27, 2006 2:02 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

wow
that might be the worst and most insane MVP defense I have ever seen from a sportswriter.

by Ian Cobb on Nov 27, 2006 2:19 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I'll be damned
Somebody here is being politically correct, and Sharky's not going to like it.

by Dustin on Nov 27, 2006 3:35 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

fairly unique yet a dime a dozen
Words are his business, and business is good...

There is no such thing as "fairly unique." Unique means "one of a kind." You can't be fairly unique anymore than "fairly pregnant."

But you could maybe forgive that. You see that word misused all the time.

But to put the words "unique" and "dime a dozen" in the same sentence?

Quite frankly, he's a douchebag...

"And boom goes the dynamite." Some Youtube clod

by Brian Thomas on Nov 27, 2006 4:47 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

So should we
feel sorry for Tom Gordon?  I was just surprised by it all.  I can't believe that made it past an editor.  It is a bit disconcerting that he says they need more protection for Howard (African American), which completely ignores the hugely talented Utley (White) and then he says they need more help for Gordon (African American) and they should ship out Burrell (white) because, like Gordon (African American), he is often injured.  Would Steve A(ss) Smith just prefer the Phillies to trade away all the white players, bring in Tori Hunter, B Bonds, K Loftin and change the team name to the Monarchs.

You know if an Inuit makes the bigs even if it is just for a cup of coffee, Steve A(ss) Smith will give him the MVP, Cy Young, Gold Glove and the Roberto Clemente award for "single-handedly transforming the focus of a sport, forcing baseball possibly the rest of us - to take a closer look at potential" prospects of the Alaskan ghettos.

I am not opposed to Howard winning the MVP this year, but it saddens me because I now realize that Steven A(ss) Smith is probably not alone in his thinking.  If that is the case then the fact that Howard is black may have been what tipped the scales.  If a white voter had said "The two choices were basically equal.  The black player was slightly better in a few stats but they were basically equal.  With all being equal I am going to pick the white player over the black player because I am white too." For one this would never get printed or aired on any credible edited source, secondly this voter would lose job and vote, and he would not be invited anywhere except a John Rocker dinner party (AKA keg party).

"Stubbornness is usually considered a negative, but I think that trait has been a positive for me." ~ Cal Ripken Jr

by kwellborn on Nov 27, 2006 8:56 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Stephen A. Smith
Most important man in the world, him and his cheese doodles!
Ruddy Yan- 2007 starting centerfielder for the Orioles...

by miles on Nov 28, 2006 12:19 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Texas Rangers.
Start posting about the Rangers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Th_buckykatt_small
MNF tonight
Cd_small
Jordan Schafer Available?
Marion_small
NFL Week 11 GDT
Roger_the_alien_american_dad_small
Josh Johnson Available?
Ochomerun_small
Who is Josey Wales?
Marion_small
Mavs GDT 11/20/09
Ebbsfleet_united_logo_small
Three way deal only works if...
Small
OT: The global warming hoax exposed?
Img_0225_2_small
Pertinent Fangraphs Articles
Texas-rangers-logo-2_small
Frankie Piliere scouting for fans now

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

Th_buckykatt_small Adam J. Morris