Some linkaliciousness
I've got my board certification exam on the 15th, and am supposed to be studying for it right now, so blogging will probably be a little on the light side between now and then.
In the meantime, here's some linkaliciousness...
The Brewers want to bring Francisco Cordero back. He's a free agent this offseason, and the pool of free agent relievers is pretty slim (really, the pool of free agent anything other than centerfielders is pretty slim), so Milwaukee is going to have to get pretty aggressive to keep him...I'm betting he walks, and gets a 4 year, $38 million deal.
John Dewan has the top and bottom 5 in plus/minus (fielding runs) for shortstops up, and your likely gold-glove winner (again) in 2007, Derek Jeter, was tied for the worse shortstop in baseball, with Hanley Ramirez. They both were at negative 33 runs.
Michael Young was at negative 15 runs...given that he was at 10.9 runs above average for his position, offensively, if Dewan's numbers are right, Young was a slightly below-average shortstop this year.
Richard Durrett lobbies for bringing the Electrician back as a long man/spot starter. Personally, I think Kam Loe is better suited for that job...and if you don't want to go with Loe, then grab a guy in the Rule 5 draft to fill that slot, or keep Mike Wood around for the first few months of the season before letting Eric Hurley get his feet wet in the majors in that role.
The Angels may have lost yesterday, but at least it afforded Bill Plaschke the opportunity to put an uppity whippersnapper in his place. Nevermind that the Angels couldn't score against Josh Beckett...John Lackey gets to be Plaschke's whipping boy...
Several years ago, on the ESPN message boards, someone came up with a stat called the TEA%, which stood for the Totally Erstad Awesomeness Percentage. Angels fans railed about the inability of those outside of Orange County to truly appreciate the awesomeness of Darin Erstad, because it could not be expressed in stats...so the TEA% was a way to try to translate that, with Erstad, of course, being the benchmark, with a TEA% of 100.
I think the TEA% should now refer to the Totally Eckstein Awesomeness Percentage. And Todd Jones is picking the Angels to win, because they have two -- TWO -- players who are like Eckstein. The Angels' team TEA% must be off the charts.
Steven Goldman chats about the playoff games today, and there are a couple of Rangers tidbits in there worth checking out.
Our friend John Barten has the final 2007 edition of the BTB Awards up, which you guys should check out.
And this is football related, rather than baseball related, but...you have to love a blog post that is tagged "big butts."
0 recs |
13
comments
Comments
Quick Thoughts...
by slimshadty12 on Oct 5, 2007 1:13 AM CDT 0 recs
BP Chat
by hightowersmith on Oct 5, 2007 1:34 AM CDT 0 recs
What a reach
For the sake of sanity (I didn't even dare to click on that deathwish).
by Chase Irwin on Oct 5, 2007 3:58 AM CDT 0 recs
Todd Jones
by WyoRanger on Oct 5, 2007 9:46 AM CDT 0 recs
Michael Young, slightly below average
Michael Young was clearly the best to maybe the 3rd best positional player on this team, on the outside.
None of the starters were any good.
We had some strength in the bullpen, but it wasn't like a stellar bullpen was pulling us above our Pythag expectation. We actually underperformed by a few games.
So at the far outside, Michael Young was the 5th most valuable player on this team, and possibly as high as 1st.
How is it possible that a team with the below average Michael Young as its 5th best player could have finished with a Pythag expectation of 78-84?
by a bebop a rebop on Oct 5, 2007 10:12 AM CDT 0 recs
Kinsler > Young
Young OPS+: 103 (pretty much an average / below-average player at everything he does)
Kinsler's defense is much better.
Athos would tell you that Young is the best player on the team: http://www.lonestarball.com/story/2007/9/18/13132/1554
It should be pretty clear, by this point.
by Chase Irwin on
Oct 5, 2007 12:21 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I was allowing some room for debate.
by a bebop a rebop on
Oct 5, 2007 12:48 PM CDT
up
0 recs
You are asking how
by DJCahill on
Oct 5, 2007 12:33 PM CDT
up
0 recs
No.
I'm asking how a team with below-average to average players as its best players can be near-average.
Let's count the above-average performers this season:
- Ian Kinsler (who I agree played better than Young this year, you guys).
- 1/2 of Mark Teixeira.
- BGL.
- Benoit.
- Marlon Byrd, I guess?
Everybody else was below-average. 20.5 out of 25 guys, and 11.5 out of 14 "regular" spots (the lineup plus the starting rotation). The bullpen was good, but the rotation was practically replacement-level for most of the season.
Pythag-wise, we were almost a .500 team. But the vast majority of our team was below-average. So where did the averageness come from?
Does that make sense?
by a bebop a rebop on
Oct 5, 2007 12:47 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Lofton, Blalock, Murphy
And really, so was most of the bullpen...Gagne, Mahay and Otsuka were all well above average. Wright, Littleton and Francisco all posted an ERA+ of better than 100.
At the end of the day, an outstanding bullpen lifted the rest of the team to almost-average.
by Adam J. Morris on
Oct 5, 2007 1:02 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Fair enough
by a bebop a rebop on
Oct 5, 2007 1:37 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Well the 30 run game
by DJCahill on
Oct 5, 2007 1:05 PM CDT
up
0 recs
We may need
by DJCahill on Oct 5, 2007 1:20 PM CDT 0 recs








