Miguel Tejada traded
The Baltimore Orioles have traded Miguel Tejada...and appear to have gotten a very nice haul for him...
According to the Baltimore Sun:
Scott is a useful COF. Patton is the Astros' top pitching prospect. Albers is a nice young pitcher. Costanzo is a decent prospect Houston got from Philly for Brad Lidge.
Houston just gave up a crapload of talent for a guy who they are probably going to have to move to third base, and who is under contract for two more years at $13 million per year.
Oh, and who put up a .270 EQA last season.
Houston had a worse record than the Rangers last year, have a terrible farm system, and yet are trying to be in "win now" mode.
I'm sure there are a few folks, those who whine on the DMN blog comments about "Tom TOO CHEAP Hicks," who will be asking where Texas was on this deal.
But this is a stupid, stupid move for Houston, one that isn't going to make the team good enough to be legit competitors in 2008, and one that hurts the Astros long-term.
Great trade for Baltimore.
53 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Yeah
Those Astros are terrible, right AJM.
As of now they're world series favorites. Period.
Oh...
Could this be the Astros lineup?
2B Matsui
RF Pence
1B Berkman
LF C. Lee
3B Tejada
C Towles
SS Everett
P
That's a pretty nice lineup. It's too bad they have Oswalt, Wandy Rodriguez, Woody Williams, Brandon Backe, and Chris Sampson to go with one of the worst bullpens in baseball.
At least it will be interesting to watch...
More likely
more like
RF/CF Pence
1B Berkman
LF C. Lee
SS Tejada
3B/RF Wiggington/Loretta
CF/RF Bourn/Loretta/Wigginton
C Ausmus
P
Its not a bad lineup, but they've got to produce 4 out of 5 games when Roy's not pitching.
by Jukebox Joe on Dec 12, 2007 12:07 PM CST up reply actions
not quite
- Bourn
- Matsui
- Berkman
- Tejada
- Lee
- Pence
- Wigginton
- Towles
- pitcher/belly itcher
Astros must not realize
I love how they've waited all this time to address the offense after the pitching they had has come and gone.
by Jukebox Joe on Dec 12, 2007 12:01 PM CST reply actions
That pitching staff
You mean
by Jukebox Joe on Dec 12, 2007 12:08 PM CST up reply actions
Tom Too Cheap Hicks
Oh I forgot, we never want the Rangers to get good players.
Trade
Baltimore's haul
I think it is a pretty good return, given the circumstances.
by Adam J. Morris on Dec 12, 2007 12:09 PM CST up reply actions
I'm with you,
1) If the astros play well, he may be the piece that puts them over the hump
and if not....
2) They have a big chip to play with at the trade-line table and reload with better than they give up.
I don't know if they were sold on any of these guys they traded. Something tells me they were looking at it as Tejeda for Patton.
by corbsclinton on Dec 12, 2007 4:20 PM CST up reply actions
The Astros
The only real difference is that they have been using trades more than Texas did, whereas Hicks money-whipped people into being Rangers. But the net result will be the same - a few years of mediocrity, followed by a total decimation of farm system (by trades or lost draft picks) requiring a complete rebuilding effort, as opposed to the easy restructuring that they should have done after 2005.
Astros farm system
by Jukebox Joe on Dec 12, 2007 12:14 PM CST up reply actions
Shark
WS favorites? Do you even watch baseball? No... better question, do you even like baseball?
by Jukebox Joe on Dec 12, 2007 2:27 PM CST up reply actions
Damnit I got bit....
by Jukebox Joe on Dec 12, 2007 2:29 PM CST up reply actions
LOL
Don't feed the troll. I know it's hard, but we must all stay strong!
Great trade for the Astros
by BillyBobisdrunk on Dec 12, 2007 12:14 PM CST reply actions
I disagree
The NL is horrible, so while I don't think the Astros are very good, the league is so bad that I'm not sure they can't compete. And if they are out of it, they should be able to turn him in July for something better than the quantity over quality package they gave up for him.
by Darrell McKown on Dec 12, 2007 12:25 PM CST reply actions
So what package of Rangers prospects
It improves the 'Stros
Don't know if this makes Houston the favorite to even win its division (CHC? STL?), but it certainly makes them a factor again.
As for the future...well, I guess Houston will cross that bridge when it comes to it.
hahahahah
Its between the Astros, Cubs and Brewers
I think this is desparation move to compete now while acknowledging that they won't be able to battle the young Milwaukee and up-and-coming Cincy after 2009.
Weird
Trade
I thought Sarfate did a pretty good job last year when he was called up, and could be a decent bullpen guy in a woefully inadequate bullpen. Patton, is one of the top pitching prospects, but the Astros are higher on Felipe Paulino. Luke Scott is another story altogether. He was terribly mishandled by Purpura, Garner and Cooper, IMHO. Matt Albers had a lot of potential, but was never able to put it together in the Majors, whether as a starter or a long reliever.
I am not really liking the directon that Wade is taking the team, to be honest. I really wanted the assistant gm from Oakland, but Uncle Drayton or Tal Smith would never go for a sabermetrics guy, but I digress.
Thanks for listening to my rant, and by the way, I went to high school with Chris Davis!
by Triple347 on Dec 12, 2007 1:17 PM CST reply actions
Time for the O's to gut their team.
I would not mind getting in on Bedard
Great trade for Baltimore?
Scott
Mitchell
Don't you think the Astros could have gotten him a bit cheaper if they waited til Friday?
I guess MLB had to approve the trade...while they're going over the Report. Hmm.
quit spreading rumors
by BillyBobisdrunk on Dec 12, 2007 5:18 PM CST up reply actions

by 


















