Some of my thoughts on the deal
Huh. Christmas Eve, 2006, DVD gets broken up, with John Danks going to the ChiSox.
362 days later, the V gets dealt. Obviously, the Rangers front office doesn't shut down early for the holidays.
I was involved in a discussion earlier today on the NMLR board, in a thread where a poster suggested a Volquez and Teagarden for Hamilton trade, which I was against. It led to an email exchange, where I was asked if I'd do Volquez for Hamilton straight up.
My response:
If I thought there was a 0% chance (or close to that) of him falling off the wagon, I'd probably do Hamilton for Volquez.
This is, like the D-Rays swap of Delmon Young for Matt Garza, a classic need for need trade...the Reds have lots of nice outfielders, particularly with Jay Bruce on the cusp, and need arms. The Rangers have lots of quality young arms, but desperately need quality in the outfield, particularly centerfield.
I have to think that Hamilton will be the Rangers' regular centerfielder. Hamilton was awful against lefties in 2007, but you don't give up Volquez to pick up a 26 year old centerfielder who is going to platoon.
Milton Bradley will be playing everyday (when he's healthy), presumably at right field, although he may have to start at DH.
That leaves left field, and either DH or RF (depending on how quickly Milton Bradley comes back from the ACL tear), to be divvied up. You've got five candidates -- Marlon Byrd, Frank Catalanotto, Jason Botts, David Murphy, and Nelson Cruz -- and presumably only three roster spots, since Chris Shelton, Ramon Vazquez, and Gerald Laird will be filling three bench roles.
I'd be fine with a Byrd/Cat platoon in left field, Botts at DH, and Murphy in AAA until someone gets hurt, although I have a sneaking suspicion that this move may spell the end of Jason Botts' time with the Rangers, which would disappoint me.
If the Rangers don't think Bradley will be ready to play RF to start the year, you end up with Murphy in RF, a Cat/Byrd platoon in LF, and Bradley DHing, although you could send Murphy down, keep Botts and platoon him in LF with Cat, and have Byrd play regularly in RF until Bradley is ready.
But I wouldn't be surprised if, at some point over the next few days, we see that Botts or Cruz has been DFA'd, with the Rangers trying to run them through waivers, or else dealt.
I saw a suggestion elsewhere that this is the Rangers "giving up" on Edinson Volquez, which reminds me of the claims last winter that the Rangers "gave up" on John Danks. I didn't buy that argument then, and I don't buy it now. I think this is the Rangers giving up someone they really like to get someone else they really like, that fills an immediate need.
I also think that you're going to see one of the broken pitchers picked up on a one year, incentive laden deal, at some point in the next month. Bartolo Colon, Jason Jennings, Fat Freddy Garcia...someone like that, on a one year deal, picked up to fill out the rotation and to give Eric Hurley a little more time before he has to step into the rotation.
0 recs |
93 comments
Comments
I hate the deal
I dislike the deal.
by hurlerhurley on
Dec 21, 2007 8:41 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Me too
by the other dierk in dallas on
Dec 21, 2007 8:46 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Opps
by the other dierk in dallas on
Dec 21, 2007 8:47 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
have another drink
by hurlerhurley on
Dec 21, 2007 9:11 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks,
by the other dierk in dallas on
Dec 21, 2007 9:43 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Botts is going to be the
by RangerMad on
Dec 21, 2007 7:00 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Because
by brettgardner on
Dec 21, 2007 7:03 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm assuming...
If not, Shelton would probably be replaced with Murphy.
by Adam J. Morris on
Dec 21, 2007 7:30 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
heres a Josh Hamilton information tidbit ...
he throws a mid 90s fastball..well he does have
a good arm on him doesn't he?
by LAMuscleFag on
Dec 21, 2007 7:06 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Hamilton
I hate to lose Volquez, but Hamilton is an impressive player in his own right, and has just as much, if not more, upside.
by RCCook on
Dec 21, 2007 7:09 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hamilton's Defense
http://www.baseballmusings.com/archives/023939.php
The Reds had an above CF and Hamilton was above average in CF by PMOR.
I have a good friend that is a Reds fan and he is sorry to see Hamilton go. He told me that Josh has great wheels in CF and is exciting to watch. Will probably become a fan favorite.
Heh, he did add that watching Griffey in CF does make lots of guys look good out there, but he felt good about Hamilton's defense.
by Brandon Wilson on
Dec 21, 2007 9:32 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Don't know...
Req
by Requiem on
Dec 22, 2007 2:07 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Bartolo
Colon could have a bounceback year and knows the division like the back of his hand...
by miles on
Dec 21, 2007 7:10 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
prior
by JKolar on
Dec 21, 2007 7:16 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That doesn't do you any good
by t ball on
Dec 21, 2007 8:51 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nope...
by slc ranger on
Dec 21, 2007 10:17 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The fact of the matter
If not we will have no worse than what we expected this team to be anyway.
by rldwb on
Dec 21, 2007 7:26 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Bill James projection for Hamilton
Let that sink in. Then remember that this is a good defensive CF.
by tricer on
Dec 21, 2007 7:35 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah, but...
by Adam J. Morris on
Dec 21, 2007 7:38 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That was genuinely funny!
by Ajax on
Dec 21, 2007 9:21 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sorry Adam, but I'll take my chances
by tklawless on
Dec 22, 2007 11:12 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And to think
by B_Black on
Dec 21, 2007 8:17 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i think
and that's a .300 average, 10 triples and 50 stolen bases. he never strikes out, but other than singles and the occasional triple, he can't hit.
hamilton has lotsa upside. not sure what you can get with him.
if we're lucky, a .290 average and 30 homers.
by gossamer on
Dec 21, 2007 8:21 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
To me you know what you're going to get
BTW, I hear he has some wheels which makes him all the more important for us because of the large dimensions of our park. I hope he has the instincts to go along with it.
by slimshadty12 on
Dec 22, 2007 6:57 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
and to think a couple of months ago
nobody wanted to give of Volquez
by hurlerhurley on
Dec 21, 2007 8:45 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Dammit!
I guess I like the deal, but I liked Edinson. And I'm going to beat senseless the first Reds writer that calls him Edison.
by WyoRanger on
Dec 21, 2007 7:36 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
damn
just damn, nothing more...
by Longhorn on
Dec 21, 2007 7:40 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
From a read or two on Reds boards
by Ed Coffin on
Dec 21, 2007 8:35 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
just double damn
eom...
by hurlerhurley on
Dec 21, 2007 8:47 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Also
by Longhorn on
Dec 21, 2007 7:48 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Jamey said
by hurlerhurley on
Dec 21, 2007 8:50 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not really ...
I bet Jamey thinks it's a great trade for the Rangers based on his opinion of Hamilton's worth.
by northtexan95 on
Dec 21, 2007 9:06 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
you are correct
Still, I'm a rather shocked we got rid of Volquez.
Anyway, thanks for the correction.
by hurlerhurley on
Dec 21, 2007 9:15 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This could make
by the other dierk in dallas on
Dec 21, 2007 8:28 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Don't Like It
by Kyle Mc on
Dec 21, 2007 8:29 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
If he stays sober
by DJCahill on
Dec 21, 2007 8:33 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The guy
by the other dierk in dallas on
Dec 21, 2007 8:40 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yep
Plus Hamilton is under the Rangers' control for five more seasons (his age 27-31 years) and gives the team a potential middle-of-the-order bat at a premium defensive position.
JD is making a real effort to add young talent with high upside- Salty, Andrus, Beltre, Kiker, Beavan, Main, and now Hamilton- and those are the kinds of players who, if they pan out, can form the nucleus of a championship ballclub. And even if they don't pan out, they often make for great trade chips.
by RCCook on
Dec 21, 2007 8:49 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Rangers control...
by slc ranger on
Dec 21, 2007 10:22 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The thing is
He better hit and continue to hit...
by Longhorn on
Dec 21, 2007 9:01 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
speed
by Brandon Wilson on
Dec 21, 2007 9:37 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If I remember correctly,
by RangerMad on
Dec 21, 2007 9:40 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
sober???
Hell, he was addicted to cocaine and crack and every drug on the street. "It got so bad at the end that I just started smoking (crack). I did it so much it was like smoking cigarettes," Hamilton says.
Hopefully he want try to commit suicide again and overdose with pills.
Hell, lets hope he doesn't decide to jump off a building in Dallas. However, he does have a good choice.
Lets see if he wants to jump. Go for the Bank of America Plaza, Renaissance Tower, Bank One Center or Chase Tower. Happy jumping, Josh.
by hurlerhurley on
Dec 21, 2007 9:02 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Heaven forbid
by jbooth17 on
Dec 21, 2007 9:21 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
+ 1
Josh Hamilton should be applauded on making such a wonderful comeback not made fun of. None of us are infallible - it could happen to you. Let's give credit where it's due his story is pretty amazing.
by LAMuscleFag on
Dec 21, 2007 10:44 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
what a retard
by hubcityraider on
Dec 22, 2007 1:32 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's a weakness
by SwiperNoSwiping on
Dec 22, 2007 7:31 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
you clearly
consider yourself lucky.
by knockoutking24 on
Dec 22, 2007 10:09 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sure I have
I didn't say it was easy to beat because it is a huge struggle every day but it can be beaten if the person has it in them to do something about it. Actual diseases can't.
Then of course there is the part where the person chose to get involved with drugs in the first place but that's a whole other discussion.
by SwiperNoSwiping on
Dec 22, 2007 10:24 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
clearly
and clearly you have no interaction with anyone who has had any major issues with addiction...either that or you just dont give a shit about them.
yes, as with 99% of the things we do are a choice.
by knockoutking24 on
Dec 22, 2007 10:33 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You
by brettgardner on
Dec 22, 2007 11:25 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You're
by WyoRanger on
Dec 22, 2007 11:41 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
its not his fault
we all love south park!
anyway, its just semantics. weakness, disease - who cares. he's probably kicked the chemical dependency (since it's been like 2 years) but he still mentally probably has to try really hard not to use. it is what it is.
by ab03 on
Dec 22, 2007 11:54 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I know you were using his arguments against him...
In the latter, there is at least SOME DECENT possibility of getting back to a place where you lead a normal life.
In Parkinson (I haven't dealt with MS so I don't know enough details), it's a slow deterioration where it takes significantly-risky medical procedures to even APPROACH a normal life.
In drug addiction, you are using the drug to reach a state of consciousness better than normal life (at least at the start). With Parkinson, you just degrade into a state in which your life eventually is a living nightmare.
With drug addiction, through proper support and a significant change in will-power and nature, you can beat it. With Parkinson's, there is no such thing.
Thankfully, there are treatments for both out there, though Parkinson doesn't currently have anything which will "cure" the afflicted.
Anyways, just thought you guys might like to know something more to depress you (as if being a Ranger's fan doesn't depress you enough).
Req
by Requiem on
Dec 22, 2007 11:55 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
dude
by Walter Sobchak on
Dec 22, 2007 10:09 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
a decent risk
by t ball on
Dec 21, 2007 8:53 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks J D for the wonderful ..
Christmas present ! He's exactly what we needed !
by LAMuscleFag on
Dec 21, 2007 8:43 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
and that was even BEFORE...
I heard about the size 19 shoes :)
by LAMuscleFag on
Dec 21, 2007 8:45 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
he's gonna be a new fan favorite
by willamos2 on
Dec 21, 2007 9:01 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yeah... it must be all those tattoos
How attractive!
by hurlerhurley on
Dec 21, 2007 9:08 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
slow down,
by t ball on
Dec 21, 2007 9:11 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Anybody else...
They dont worry me one bit. As long as he rakes I dont care.
Hell he could do drugs all he wants, as long as he continues to rake.
by SaltyGoesYard on
Dec 21, 2007 9:08 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
somebody dial 911
by hurlerhurley on
Dec 21, 2007 9:09 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What was the nature..
by TedFord on
Dec 21, 2007 9:43 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Baseball America's take
[blockquote]There's plenty to like for the Rangers here. Texas turned a pitcher who has overstayed his welcome into a potential impact middle-of-the-order bat who fills one of their bigger needs.
For the Reds, it's a more risky move since they're gambling on being able to turn Volquez into a solid member of the big league rotation, something the Rangers failed to do in six years. But at the same time, in one year the Reds turned a $50,000 investment in Hamilton into a potential member of their starting rotation. By dealing away Hamilton, they trade away a rather injury-prone player from a position of strength to fill a clear need at another position.[/blockquote]
by Brandon Wilson on
Dec 21, 2007 9:57 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
That's such a dumb take on Volquez
Does Gerry Fraley work for BA now?
by thedirkatron on
Dec 21, 2007 10:02 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
WTF
Fuck off BA! I swear, I've got to where I can't stand BA anymore.
by hurlerhurley on
Dec 21, 2007 10:32 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Talent wise, we win
Hate to see Eddy go.
Good luck, brother.
by thedirkatron on
Dec 21, 2007 10:01 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm in favor of it
I'm skeptical, because, by his own account, he's already had 8 chances, or fresh starts, so to speak, in rehab. He's tried to kill himself 3-5 times.
I welled up a little when I read that espn testimonial. I really want him to succeed, because I already really, really like the guy, and he has 2 little kids depending on him, not to mention a wife that has probably given this dude many more chances than he had coming. Most of you that know me here know I'm the last person to get sanctimonious about a hedonistic lifestyle.
I'm pro-cocktail.
But he was a train wreck for 5 years; he's been clean for 2. I don't think it's any kind of dire prediction to be a little on the pessimistic side about him staying clean and sober. The sad fact of the matter is that the relapse rate in cases like his is well over 50%.
For that reason, I think this trade is a much bigger gamble than most people here evidently do. I also find the idea that the Reds were so quick to trade him after this breakout season, not to mention evidently caving on getting anything meaningful in addition to EV, is another red flag.
And then there's the injuries.
I emailed Evan a question about the consequences of further failed drug tests. Haven't heard back. The slacker. If he faces any kind of year-long or severe suspensions from 1 more failed test, I'd grade this trade a D.
Right now, I give it a B-, but I agree it was a gamble we definitely had to take.
Juan "Juevos" Daniels.
Not an ounce of fear in our man. That's something I'm unambivalently happy about it...
by Brian Thomas on
Dec 21, 2007 10:53 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Ok, right after I badmouth Evan, I check the mail
"Brian:
Thanks again. The info you ask about is indeed pertinent and was the
first
thing I asked Daniels about when I got him aside after the press
conference.
There is no designated penalty for a fifth offense of the
recreational/street drug policy. It is at the commissioner's
discretion. I
am also told that Hamilton's willingness to be tested regularly and
cooperation with the program makes it more likely that the commish
would be
lenient if he had a relapse. At least the first time he had a relapse.
Thanks,
Evan
***
Well, that's certainly badass news.
Hip hip hoorah for the longevity of the Steve Howe Rule...
by Brian Thomas on
Dec 21, 2007 10:58 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"Juevos" Daniels
If he doesn't get this organization turned around, it certainly won't be because he didn't have the stones to pull it off.
And I agree that there is plenty of risk with the clean and sober thing. But if he does make it, I think Hamilton will be right there behind Sizemore and Granderson in the AL centerfielder ranks. And the thought of a 900+ OPS CF with good range and a cannon arm patrolling center at the Ballpark has me a lot more excited than the thought of watching a young pitcher with 2 really good pitches and command problems break in.
I was discussing the Hamilton for Volquez + Teagarden scenario w/ Adam and others on the NMLR earlier today, and personally I would have done that deal if that is what it took.
by tricer on
Dec 21, 2007 11:07 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
So...
2B- Kinsler
SS- Young
CF- Hamilton
DH- Bradley
3B- Blalock
LF- Cat
1B- Broussard
CA- Salty
RF- Murphy
Against Lefties...
2B- Kinsler
SS- Young
CF- Hamilton
DH- Bradley
3B- Blalock
CA- Salty
1B- Shelton
RF- Byrd
LF- Murphy
Laird and Vazquez (or maybe Duran) are your other 2 position players. This pretty much means Botts and Cruz are gone, unless Bradley starts the year on the DL and the Rangers keep Botts. I believe Cruz is gone no matter what now.
I also believe the middle of the order is now Hamilton, Bradley, Blalock as long as Bradley is healthy. Wash may mess with Hamilton and Blalock against lefties but I would leave them there. This also means Ian should lead off imo against lefties and righties. I really like him ahead of MY and I also love MY in the 2 hole. Kinsler has enough talent that LHP or RHP should not matter.
Rotation...
Millwood
Padilla
McCarthy
Gabbard
FA
I think the 5th hole will be filled by a veteran FA pitcher. I think Hurley should spend some more time in AAA.
Pen...
BGL
Jack
Frankie
Littleton
Kazuo
Loe
Rheino/Guardado
BGL should close and Kam is your long man. I would give the loogy to Rheino but that could change if Eddie shows he is healthy and effective.
That is how I see things as of now. However we don't know if JD has anything left. Could he get another valuable player for Cruz/Botts/Byrd/Cat or just a minor leaguer? Who will the fifth starter be? I don't think many more moves will be made but hey remember when everyone was watching FA's sign left and right and some were bitching about JD not doing anything, can't sat that now.
by slc ranger on
Dec 21, 2007 11:10 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
the lineup is looking ..
pretty good SLC... now time to work on the pitching..the starting staff is suspect at best.
by LAMuscleFag on
Dec 21, 2007 11:24 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not that bad
Also the opening on the starting staff gives us something to be interested in moving forward. Sign a vet? trade for guy you like? start Tejeda? accelerate Hurley's path to the pros? Lots of possible directions here.
by hubcityraider on
Dec 22, 2007 1:44 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Is JD fired if this deal
I like the trade I do, but how quickly are we going to turn if Edinson sticks and Hamy's play sucks or he's injured?
Edinson is going to do great in the National League probably, we gotta start praying for Josh's sobriety every night right now.
by Jukebox Joe on
Dec 21, 2007 11:31 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't like it.
The problem of a lacking starting rotation is far and above the problem of a lacking offense.
I'd rather see Volquez fail here and we know for sure than for Hamilton to go to two All-Star games.
by mattrpav on
Dec 21, 2007 11:35 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Thats the one
We didn't find out what we had in Edinson.
If he had come out and struggled again this upcoming season, then I'd be okay of course.
by Jukebox Joe on
Dec 21, 2007 11:41 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
also
by knockoutking24 on
Dec 21, 2007 11:59 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Wasn't Volquez
So, not even weeks later, one is gone, traded..
by Sharky on
Dec 24, 2007 8:51 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah, genius
by t ball on
Dec 24, 2007 10:13 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hamilton's under control for 5 years.
by a bebop a rebop on
Dec 24, 2007 11:03 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thats beastly.
by miles on
Dec 24, 2007 11:16 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wow
Hamilton? I've followed his story like everyone else here. My concern is that heavy drug abuse wreaks havoc on the body. There's no question he has a lot of talent. If the trade were based purely on talent I'd call it a draw because Volquez, I believe, is underrated in that department.
I'm not in favor of this trade and am souring on Daniels. I realize they need a centerfielder, but with Young, Danks, and now Volquez gone they sure have given up a lot of high-upside pitchers. They apparently think they have more pitching depth than they actually do.
by Dustin on
Dec 25, 2007 11:12 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs








