Gagne to the BoSox?
I get back from lunch, and discover that Ken Rosenthal is reporting that the BoSox and Rangers have agreed on a deal for Eric Gagne, pending Gagne's waiving his no-trade clause.
Rosenthal says it is Kason Gabbard and something else.
Bleah to Gabbard, a 25 year old lefty who couldn't crack BA's top 30 prospects for the BoSox last season, and seems like another John Koronka to me.
Update [2007-7-31 15:41:17 by Adam J. Morris]: -- Rosenthal identifies the players:
Update [2007-7-31 15:54:11 by Adam J. Morris]: -- Having thought about it, and looking at the numbers, I'm maybe coming around a little on Murphy. He's supposedly a plus defensive centerfielder, and his numbers against righthanded pitchers this season in AAA have been pretty solid. He might be a useful tag-team partner for Marlon Byrd in center for 2008 or fourth outfielder. Might.
0 recs |
179 comments
Comments
yea along with
by Lonerangers on Jul 31, 2007 1:54 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Supposed to be
by slimshadty12 on Jul 31, 2007 1:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
5-tool
by RangerMoto on Jul 31, 2007 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
any other info on him
by Lonerangers on Jul 31, 2007 2:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
does PECOTA even project that young?
by RangerMoto on Jul 31, 2007 2:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Beltre is...
by ortonius on Jul 31, 2007 1:55 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
And the Teixeira deal is final
by RangerMoto on Jul 31, 2007 1:55 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
i am unimpressed
meh.
by DSheppard on Jul 31, 2007 1:56 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
true but why would anyone trade for sosa
by dubman on Jul 31, 2007 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Found this...
Angel Beltre, OF, Dominicana (16)
A left-handed hitter with extra-base power. He has a powerful throwing arm and plays great defense in the outfield.
by ortonius on Jul 31, 2007 1:57 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
and below was this...
by ortonius on Jul 31, 2007 1:57 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Not good
Gabbard and Murphy sound like depth guys to me.
Hopefully Beltre will pan out, but 16 is a long way from the major leagues.
by bflood36 on Jul 31, 2007 1:58 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
two draft picks
by Brandon Wilson on Jul 31, 2007 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It takes
by FirebatM3 on Jul 31, 2007 2:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not completely given....
And Gagne was rated as 69-70 last year.
Of course, I'm thinking even a type B compensation would have been better than this dreck....
Gabbard, Murphy and a 17 yo who's batting .200?
Bleh.
Gabbard = Koronka. David Murphy is a COF who's BEST year in the minors was .267/.355/.447, and a 17 yo will likely take longer to get to the majors than a supplemental pick probably would....
I think JD screwed the pooch on this one. He was pushing too hard on the Mets and Yankees, then when they both pulled out got desperate in the end.
I like the Linebrink return MUCH, MUCH better.
-Inman, 20yo pitcher, likely the top Brewer prospect after Gallardo and Braun.
-Thatcher, a RP who had a K/9 of 11.69 and BB/9 of
2.25 in the minors.
-Garrison, 20 yo decent prospect in A+
In fact, I think I like each of those prospects BETTER than any of the prospects that we got for Gagne.....
JD gets an F for this trade.
Req
by Requiem on Jul 31, 2007 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gagne
Anyway, I agree that the return on Linebrink was better (much much better), but I also think Milwaukee got SCREWED badly in that trade, so I'm not sure that's a fair baseline.
This trade is only palatable to me if Gagne was not going to be a type "A" OR if this Gabbard is Koronka + consistent control. Murphy sucks. The kid I know nothing about other than he got a big bonus.
by Brandon Wilson on Jul 31, 2007 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That does make a difference....
by bflood36 on Jul 31, 2007 2:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i wish ppl...
by erikj07 on Jul 31, 2007 1:59 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
are those
by SteveP on Jul 31, 2007 2:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Choice C
by FirebatM3 on Jul 31, 2007 2:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
exactly
Couple of wildcards though:
Boras has a reputation of including no-arb clauses in his clients contracts (Pudge, Kenny). If Gagne had one of those, we would have lost him for no compensation.
The Latin teen could eventually be something.
by tricer on Jul 31, 2007 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't want
Beltre does give this deal a ray of hope, though.
by bflood36 on Jul 31, 2007 2:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
ya
by kumar75150 on Jul 31, 2007 2:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It is a ray from a star
by bflood36 on Jul 31, 2007 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
engel beltre
170 lbs. OBP is at .315.
looks very promising. not too high on murphy. we will see with gabbard the rest of the season. initially doesn't look great, but could look back on this as a really good trade.
by mo on Jul 31, 2007 2:01 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
gabbard
by kumar75150 on Jul 31, 2007 2:02 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
David Murphy
by RangerMoto on Jul 31, 2007 2:04 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Gabbard and Belre ok
by TexGoesYard on Jul 31, 2007 2:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He used to be good....
2003 Baylor .413/.487/.614, picked 17th in the draft
GMJ candidate.
by rooster on Jul 31, 2007 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
girly swing
by tricer on Jul 31, 2007 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Engel Beltre
by RangerMoto on Jul 31, 2007 2:05 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Damn
by Lonerangers on Jul 31, 2007 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
from the Boston Globe
by LukeR on Jul 31, 2007 2:05 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Kason Gabbard
by RangerMoto on Jul 31, 2007 2:06 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I love everybody on here
Most of you assholes are not even fully clothed right now. So lets go ahead and wait untill they suck in a Ranger uniform before you prematurely ejaculate on the cat again.
by TexGoesYard on Jul 31, 2007 2:06 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Prediction
by FirebatM3 on Jul 31, 2007 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he sucks
by TexGoesYard on Jul 31, 2007 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You
by kwellborn on Jul 31, 2007 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Incorrect
by TexGoesYard on Jul 31, 2007 2:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What do you know,
by kwellborn on Jul 31, 2007 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
damn dude
by OkieFromMuskogee on Jul 31, 2007 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by miles on Jul 31, 2007 2:06 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Per Newberg: 5th player in Tex deal
by sprite on Jul 31, 2007 2:06 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
WOW!!
by dstar442005 on Jul 31, 2007 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Damn
by Lonerangers on Jul 31, 2007 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
nice
by AmosM on Jul 31, 2007 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And...
by Suicide Prince on Jul 31, 2007 3:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
^^^^^^^^ WOW!
any1 know the last 5 for 1 trade to go down.
with jones, i count all of those guys as people who can contribute in major ways. Neftali throws 98 and is 19 and gonna be in high a, Salty is a switch hitting catcher with power (think about the value of switch hitting catcher! awesome), but wait, we also get the most widely viewed phenon SS whose 18 and in high A, a solid (not my favorite but a good solid pitcher in harrison whose not old (#3 on braves by BA) and Beau Jones, he was #10 on the braves prospect list. he destroyed in SAL but struggled in Myrtle Beach. but he only started 1 time and has 5 appearances so chances are he's just adjusting.
what a steal. seems like to me at least. best trade at unloading our talent i think ive ever seen. very impressed.
by Jayslick on Jul 31, 2007 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
poor mahay
5 for 2 trade
by rkh on Jul 31, 2007 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is there
by kwellborn on Jul 31, 2007 2:10 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Id rather setup
Not to mention RedSox=Playoffs
Yankees = Hell
by TexGoesYard on Jul 31, 2007 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't
by kwellborn on Jul 31, 2007 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
when...
by RangerMoto on Jul 31, 2007 2:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Engel stats
a couple things of note:
-this has AJ Prellor writtin all over it, latin scouting going and getting a guy they missed out on not long ago
-he was the 2nd ranked by ESPN in Latin signings, think Yan and Christian Santana potential
- he was the highest price the sox have ever spent on a latin signing.
-his obp is pretty high considering his BA. looks like he has good discipline and projectable power.
this kid gives us another Andrus basically, but who can play CF and hit for power. some day.
i love the snaffle up of really young prospects. this totally changes the trades make up.
this kid is the key. pretty wild.
by Jayslick on Jul 31, 2007 2:12 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
looks like his best tool
by SteveP on Jul 31, 2007 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the thing u gotta keep in mind is
look at those nummber he looks like hitting is the key but if u look at his power and his SB's. he looks like he can be something really special. he's special.
man, ive been thinking about this, and i think we probably have to have one of the strongest low minors in baseball at this point just talent-wise.
AZL:
Engel Beltre
Michael Main
Wilmer Font
Cristian Santana
Emmanuel Solis
Miguel Velazquez
NOR:
Fabio Castillo
Jacob Brigham
Keisuke Ueno <<<< i like this kid. we stole him from japan like 2 seasons ago, not sure how.
Johan Yan
Eric Fry
Neftali Feliz
MID:
Kasey Kiker
Zachary Phillips
Omar Poveda
Manuel Pina
Marcus Lemon
K.C. Herren
David Paisano
CAL:
Beau Jones
Elvis Andrus
John Whittleman
Max Ramirez
that list is all below AA and it doesnt include Beaven and Ramirez Nash Borbon who havent signed. thats really impressive.
i like that JD has decided to build the system from the ground up. total rebuild. you can see his mark on this team for a long time now. the youth he has accumulated is very impressive. one can only assume that with a continued emphasis on youth and filling the system completely at every level with talent will reward this team with success for a long time to come. finally a direction can be seen. the andrus and beltre and feliz add serious high ceiling potential to this franchise. im gonna stop now. needless to say, im impressed with the job jd has done.
btw, murphy is a classic buy low. he gets on base, can play defense at 3 OF spots, maybe rudy can fix him and raise his BA. he was highly thought of at one point. im not crazy about gabbard and murphy but in understand why murphy was of interest.
by Jayslick on Jul 31, 2007 3:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good point
by uthornfan on Jul 31, 2007 3:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
interesting
by hubcityraider on Jul 31, 2007 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
since we have nothing to play for
by kumar75150 on Jul 31, 2007 2:14 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'll be interested to here what the final trade is
by DJCahill on Jul 31, 2007 2:15 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
if beltre is part of the deal..
I saw Beltre workouts here in Santo Domingo.. he is great..
and it is hungry of being a new dominican star.
Engel
by engelsol on Jul 31, 2007 2:18 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
ESPN just raved
by HaoleKlaus on Jul 31, 2007 2:18 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
if it's from ESPN...
by RangerMoto on Jul 31, 2007 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
whatever....
by erikj07 on Jul 31, 2007 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know
Either that or they are being good Red Sox fans and are trying to convince everyone that the Red Sox are a great team to trade all of your talent to.
by kwellborn on Jul 31, 2007 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well you see my friend
I mean, its just the way it goes.
by TexGoesYard on Jul 31, 2007 2:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
change
If you really think Kruk and Gammons know wtf they are talking about.
by kumar75150 on Jul 31, 2007 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh no
But, still more stock than I put into most of any of you guys on here, is my point.
by TexGoesYard on Jul 31, 2007 2:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because the folks on LSB
We should just believe that the Rangers always make the right trade everytime they make one and ignore our own opinions, because JD never does any wrong.
by DJCahill on Jul 31, 2007 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
See here is what annoys me
They are negative from the get go, that way if what they say does happen, they can drop the "SEE, GOD I KNEW ALL ALONG, I TOLD ALL OF YOU!!! I SHOULD BE GM?!?!"
And if they happen to be wrong, and they turn out good nobody cares, because the rangers are doing good.
Give it a damn chance, untill they suck in a rangers uniform.
by TexGoesYard on Jul 31, 2007 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Isn't it enough
Given how well JD has drafted, is there any reason to think that Engel Beltre will turn out better than the two draft picks we would have gotten for Gagne?
by FirebatM3 on Jul 31, 2007 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Understandable
by TexGoesYard on Jul 31, 2007 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would
by FirebatM3 on Jul 31, 2007 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i like how....
by erikj07 on Jul 31, 2007 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So be a brainless sheep?
by DJCahill on Jul 31, 2007 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Im NOT fucking saying
I want Jason Botts to play more than anything for this team, but if he sucks, im going to be the first one to request that they DFA his ass.
I love "good luck with that" such intensity! Your point was ramped up with that at the end.
by TexGoesYard on Jul 31, 2007 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The problem
by trza on Jul 31, 2007 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
One dude is saying
What we are saying is that it's a stupid trade.
by FirebatM3 on Jul 31, 2007 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
you got that right
equanimity = lack of credibility
skepticism = potential for insight
negativity = perspicuity
cynicism = wisdom
by LukeR on Jul 31, 2007 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gabbard
I guess he goes in the rotation right away.
by kumar75150 on Jul 31, 2007 2:20 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
i think
by erikj07 on Jul 31, 2007 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i guess
by kumar75150 on Jul 31, 2007 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well...
by erikj07 on Jul 31, 2007 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So would...
by ortonius on Jul 31, 2007 2:21 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
he is already
by kumar75150 on Jul 31, 2007 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It is our...
</sarcasm>
by bjtaylor on Jul 31, 2007 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i agree...
by erikj07 on Jul 31, 2007 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
because
by Brandon Wilson on Jul 31, 2007 2:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes Gabbard
by slimshadty12 on Jul 31, 2007 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
anyone
by OkieFromMuskogee on Jul 31, 2007 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
is there a worse franchise than the Rangers
Probably the Nationals. Maybe the Royals. Id rather be a Devil Rays fan.
by kumar75150 on Jul 31, 2007 2:27 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
devil rays
by OkieFromMuskogee on Jul 31, 2007 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
at least they have
+ shields and crawford
by kumar75150 on Jul 31, 2007 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
also
by kumar75150 on Jul 31, 2007 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's retarded
Congratulations.
There are worse organizations than the Rangers, the Astros for one.
by FirebatM3 on Jul 31, 2007 2:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is anything better in Houston?
by shallrelicme on Jul 31, 2007 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, if you're looking
by FirebatM3 on Jul 31, 2007 3:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not to mention
by Taylor on Jul 31, 2007 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
True
by OkieFromMuskogee on Jul 31, 2007 2:32 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Good Deal
by bjtaylor on Jul 31, 2007 2:33 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
You mean
Gagne has proved that he can protect ANY lead. Let's not degrade a very good player in order to make ourselves feel better about the crappy, awful return we got for him.
by FirebatM3 on Jul 31, 2007 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not...
by bjtaylor on Jul 31, 2007 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Except
Put it this way, what would you rather have, Michael Main and Julio Bourbon or David Murphy and Kason Gabbard?
by FirebatM3 on Jul 31, 2007 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why are refusing to acknowledge this Beltre kid???
by slimshadty12 on Jul 31, 2007 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
no... BUT
by erikj07 on Jul 31, 2007 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed...
by slimshadty12 on Jul 31, 2007 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i agree...
by erikj07 on Jul 31, 2007 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
ok, ive accepted it.
I think I'd give the overall deadline a B+.
by DSheppard on Jul 31, 2007 2:34 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Wait, wait, wait...
So, why the hell are Red Sox fans saying we got fleeced? Seriously, what am I missing?
by RadicalBender on Jul 31, 2007 2:34 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
We didn't get three prospects
by FirebatM3 on Jul 31, 2007 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Firebat...
by erikj07 on Jul 31, 2007 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You mean
by FirebatM3 on Jul 31, 2007 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
okay....
by erikj07 on Jul 31, 2007 2:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No the ultimate crap shoot
by FirebatM3 on Jul 31, 2007 2:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
obviously....
by erikj07 on Jul 31, 2007 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
he's actually
http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/B/Engel-Beltre.shtml
by dstar442005 on Jul 31, 2007 3:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
so are you saying
by Lonerangers on Jul 31, 2007 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Of course not
by FirebatM3 on Jul 31, 2007 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yea well
by Lonerangers on Jul 31, 2007 2:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Except for
Once again, the Red Sox package vs. Niel Ramirez/Michael Main, which one would you prefer.
by FirebatM3 on Jul 31, 2007 2:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well
by Lonerangers on Jul 31, 2007 3:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Except that
But beyond that point, even as trade bait, which is more likely to attract a better offer, the Red Sox package or Niel Ramirez/Michael Main (or Julio Borbon and Michael Main, which ever way you slice it).
by FirebatM3 on Jul 31, 2007 3:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not even
by Lonerangers on Jul 31, 2007 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Uh...
Again, and I'm asking this seriously because I don't follow the minors like a lot of people here do, what am I missing?
by RadicalBender on Jul 31, 2007 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let me put it this way
by FirebatM3 on Jul 31, 2007 2:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wait so...
by slimshadty12 on Jul 31, 2007 2:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
K
Elvis Andrus is a prospect because he's playing in an actual league, A+ in fact, that's far and away young for his league, by 4, 5 years. Engel Beltre is in ROOKIE league, and is a whooping 1.5 years younger. That's 3 levels of difference between them. Andrus is actually legitimately close, Beltre is not. If you can't wrap your head around why you don't trade a proven commodity for a guy who at best will help you in 5-6 years, then I don't know what to tell you.
To reiterate, the Rangers equivalent of this trade would have been
- Johan Yan - Engel Beltre
- John Koronka - Kason Gabbard
- Brandon Boggs - David Murphy (except Boggs has much more upside, so maybe Kevin Mahar)
by FirebatM3 on Jul 31, 2007 2:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
firebat....
by erikj07 on Jul 31, 2007 2:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Ranger World Series Curse
Atlanta vs. Boston in the World Series.
Texas Rangers: Suppliers to Champions!
by Clueless on Jul 31, 2007 2:38 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
this gabbard guy
by OkieFromMuskogee on Jul 31, 2007 2:39 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
stats
by OkieFromMuskogee on Jul 31, 2007 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
holy crap...
by corbsclinton on Jul 31, 2007 2:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Uh Okie
We deal in minor league stats only here.
by TexGoesYard on Jul 31, 2007 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
uh
by OkieFromMuskogee on Jul 31, 2007 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
most players need a little time to adjust
by shallrelicme on Jul 31, 2007 2:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
uh
by OkieFromMuskogee on Jul 31, 2007 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
uh go fuck yourself
by OkieFromMuskogee on Jul 31, 2007 2:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Koronka's first 7 starts
4-1 49.2 IP 3.65 ERA
Gabbard's first 7 starts this year:
4-0 41 IP 3.73 ERA
Gabbard's peripherals are better, but the point is that Koronka also started pretty strong last year.
by LukeR on Jul 31, 2007 2:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kason Gabbard
His line that game. Yes, it is against KC. Yes, we just got swept by KC:
W - 4-0 - 9.0 IP CG - 3H - 1BB - 8SO.
Find me a comparable start. Hell, the most recent start that was close was Rheinecker's.
41.0 IP with a 3.73 ERA.
Yeah, he's a scrub. rolls eyes
Quit looking a gift horse in the mouth, naysayers.
by bjtaylor on Jul 31, 2007 2:45 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Hey buddy
by FirebatM3 on Jul 31, 2007 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
dude
by OkieFromMuskogee on Jul 31, 2007 2:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Your blood pressure
You are kicking and screaming to cut these guys off at the knees every chance you get, every post you see.
by TexGoesYard on Jul 31, 2007 2:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It is quite over the top
by bflood36 on Jul 31, 2007 2:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which he likely will
by FirebatM3 on Jul 31, 2007 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
link
by RangerMack on Jul 31, 2007 2:53 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
You should put a poll on this trade Adam
by shallrelicme on Jul 31, 2007 2:53 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Press conference
by RCCook on Jul 31, 2007 2:57 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Reasons why people use minor league numbers....
It's really impossible to predict with any accuracy how someone will do based on 50 IP worth of data.
It's much easier to do it from ~500 IP worth of data.
And Bill James has shown that it is about as accurate to predict from minor league numbers as it is from major league numbers.
Therefore, most people now use minor league stats to predict potential major league performance.
Of course, this DOESN'T mean that anything is guaranteed (for instance, no one KNOWS what Gabbard, Murphy, etc. will do). But you can have a sense of what they're VERY LIKELY to do.
On a completely separate topic, I did not know that Murphy was a good defensive CF. That makes him better, because if he does fail to hit (and he very likely will), then, at least he can be a decent 4th-5th OF.
That's still not a big upside.
OTOH, in response to the Linebrink return not being realistic. The point is that he netted THREE guys who I'd rather have than any of the guys we got back for Gagne. That's how bad this trade was, IMO.
Req
by Requiem on Jul 31, 2007 3:04 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I can't believe the Yankees didn't block this
by rooster on Jul 31, 2007 3:10 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Between that one
by BudLight on Jul 31, 2007 3:11 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
For non-Rangers/non-Red Sox slanted analysis,
Req
by Requiem on Jul 31, 2007 3:16 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
can't really call BTF
by a bebop a rebop on Aug 1, 2007 2:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting tidbit
by Randy Richardson on Jul 31, 2007 5:03 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 














