Wednesday morning stuff
So starts a new era in Rangers baseball.
Was out socializing last night, and didn't see the game, but 1 run from Brandon McCarthy in 6+ innings I'll take, even if the Ks and walks weren't where you'd like him. And he's dangerously close to seeing his ERA drop below 5.00 for the season.
Evan Grant writes that Jarrod Saltalamacchia will be catching a couple of days per week and also playing first base, with Adam Melhuse serving as the emergency catcher and also playing first base and third base.
Grant also says that Jon Daniels is heading to Cleveland today to personally discuss the Sammy Sosa situation, apparently with Ron Washington and Sosa.
If the Rangers are going to call up Jason Botts, it puts them in a bit of a tight spot, as far as the roster goes, if (as Tom Hicks said yesterday) Sosa isn't going to be released, because you've got two guys, in Botts and Sosa, who aren't going to play in the field, and another guy, in Melhuse, who is almost never going to play.
But given that Daniels is going up to Cleveland to talk about the Jason Botts situation, I'm guessing Botts is coming up today or tomorrow, and Sosa's playing time will be dropping dramatically.
Grant also has a piece up on the attempts by the team to extend Teixeira:
Only a week before the meeting, Teixeira said the Rangers had never approached him about an extension. He reiterated that stance after the club left Anaheim and traveled to Oakland. A Rangers source, however, said the club had made "overtures" to Teixeira on at least three occasions.
As Teixeira hastily checked out of the Rangers' Cleveland hotel to catch a flight to Atlanta on Tuesday afternoon, he declined to comment on anything Rangers related. Asked if an extension proposal had ever been brought up to him, Teixeira said, "I'm not talking about any of that. I'm an Atlanta Brave. That's done. I'm very happy. That's it."
Ken Rosenthal trashed Hicks for going public with this:
Hicks can spout off about offering Teixeira about $140 million for eight years, but it was an offer Teixeira was certain to refuse. Everyone in baseball knows that Teixeira's agent, Scott Boras, prefers his clients to determine their values on the open market. Heck, Hicks should know it better than anyone, having signed many a Boras client, including a certain $252-million bauble way back when.
Maybe, in the abstract, Rosenthal is right.
But given that Tom Hicks has been ripped by just about everyone in D/FW (including me, on numerous occasions) for being a tightwad, given that there was a column just yesterday by Jim Reeves taking Hicks to the woodshed for refusing to pony up and pay Teixeira, I don't blame him for going public with the contract offer.
And if, in fact, the response was that he wasn't interested in making a long-term commitment, I think that tells you all you need to know about the Rangers' chances of keeping Mark Teixeira around. He didn't want to be here. And since I rip Hicks when I think he's being cheap, I will commend him for making what I think is a very legitimate offer, and one that I think would have at least gotten the parties to the table and gotten a deal done if Teixeira wanted to be a Ranger for the next 8 years.
Gil LeBreton is particularly harsh in regards to Teixeira and Boras:
Talk about bluffing. Teixeira was hailed by some local sheep for "telling like it is" about Hicks. He chastised the franchise for operating "like a small-market club."
That "small-market" team offered him $140 million -- $60 million more than Michael Young -- to remain a Ranger. But Mark Teixeira said no way.
So who was misleading who here?
In the American League, he was a one-time All-Star. In the National League, good luck. Teixeira isn't as good as first basemen Albert Pujols, Ryan Howard, Prince Fielder, Derek Lee, Lance Berkman or even Carlos Delgado.
0 recs |
73 comments
Comments
Jarrod vs Laird
He's still just 27, he's got value and ML experience, there are some signs he doesn't get along great with Wash, and everyone's howling for Jarrod to catch in order to really pay off.
It's a break-in period for Saltalamacchia as much as for Botts and Cruz.
by hightowersmith on Aug 1, 2007 10:20 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Laird in the NL
by mattrpav on Aug 1, 2007 10:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
NL
by BAC on Aug 1, 2007 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he's a good fit in the NL
What would come in a return for him?
by mtex on Aug 1, 2007 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Padres?
by Brandon Wilson on Aug 1, 2007 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Serious
by hightowersmith on Aug 1, 2007 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
D'Rays, Marlins
Both those teams have potential 1B that they could flip back in Johnny Gomes and Mike Jacobs. I wouldn't mind flipping Laird + for one of those guys to play first base for us next season.
by tricer on Aug 2, 2007 9:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the question you have to ask yourself...
If they are just going to stick Wilkerson there, I might rather hang on to Laird for another year.
by clinton33 on Aug 1, 2007 1:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
why?
by ab03 on Aug 1, 2007 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Wilkerson is even being considered as an option
by DJCahill on Aug 1, 2007 1:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
wilkerson
by ab03 on Aug 1, 2007 1:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tex in the NL
by mattrpav on Aug 1, 2007 10:22 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Berkman
by Adam J. Morris on Aug 1, 2007 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOl
And amazingly, the small market Astros managed to sign him. Truly an amazing feat, maybe they can give the Rangers tips.
by Sharky on Aug 1, 2007 10:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
by erikj07 on Aug 1, 2007 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
GIL HODGES
by kaiser on Aug 1, 2007 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not that it matters at all
by cgolden on Aug 1, 2007 10:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
no way
by trza on Aug 1, 2007 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
hmm
Not to be an ass, Just wondering. Because I think Berkman is by far the more valuable hitter.
by BHill on Aug 1, 2007 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Berkman
Berkman eqa's:
- .331
- .320
- .311
- .335
- .317
- .334
Teix eqa:
- .263
- .292
- .309
- .287
- .306
by BAC on Aug 1, 2007 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Teixeira
That is what is so dumbfounding about his "value" right now. I am baffled that the Braves gave up so much for him, when there are probably ten other first basemen I'd prefer to have over Teixeira.
Honestly, I think him rejecting that 8yr/140 million offer is the best thing that could happen to the Rangers. We got 5 legit prospects, and frankly... he's just not that good... Its not wasted money, but we're not talking ARod or Pujols here.
Like I think someone said - you put too much on the table for one guy for that long, you end up with a Todd Helton type situation where everyone completely resents their "francise player"
by JBImaknee on Aug 1, 2007 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tex had one good year
by timraub on Aug 1, 2007 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
no he's really not
by ab03 on Aug 1, 2007 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wish our entire team
by DJCahill on Aug 1, 2007 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Teixiera
by pblack on Aug 1, 2007 10:23 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
you can't blame the teams' woes
LeBreton obviously thinks Tex has hit is peak if he thinks he can't beat out Delgado and Berkman.
by ab03 on Aug 1, 2007 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
by rooster on Aug 1, 2007 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hopefully Mellhouse becomes much
by cgolden on Aug 1, 2007 10:29 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Game Last Night
by jshcmp on Aug 1, 2007 10:39 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think
by BHill on Aug 1, 2007 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't see
by jshcmp on Aug 1, 2007 10:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hicks actually made an offer?
With the way salaries are expoloding, not sure how reasonable an offer 8/140 really is, though.
by Sharky on Aug 1, 2007 10:44 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Although
Might have been just a case of Hicks throwing a lowball offer at a guy he was about to trade just on the odd chance he might accept it.
Regardless, Hicks has angered many more fans by letting yet another top notch Ranger go. And attendence is low as is, after years of defections.
by Sharky on Aug 1, 2007 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hicks' offer
by RCCook on Aug 1, 2007 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Manny signed years ago
I could just as well point at Ichiro's deal.
by Sharky on Aug 1, 2007 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And Pujols.
by rooster on Aug 1, 2007 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Years ago
Also, those teams negotiate with there players and have good relations with them over time, the Rangers dont.
by Sharky on Aug 1, 2007 10:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Most players..
The Rangers anger all their players with callous handling, calling them worthless, etc.
by Sharky on Aug 1, 2007 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe Young is the turning point on this.
by rooster on Aug 1, 2007 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Way to dominate last night!
by rooster on Aug 1, 2007 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
For starters
Second: Like rooster said that was some very nice pitching last night. I nearly fell out of my chair when you dropped down sidearm.
by Escher on Aug 1, 2007 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
With one single trade...
by rooster on Aug 1, 2007 10:56 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
And attendance drops again
by Sharky on Aug 1, 2007 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Commercials
by mtex on Aug 1, 2007 11:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
DUUUDE....
...all of a sudden, this team has become a lot younger... and i think you definetely have to push that... being young... summertime... baseball...
i'll have to mull this over... but, man... i'd love to pitch it... and shoot it. ha!
by oc on Aug 1, 2007 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll volunteer
by arlingtonballgirl on Aug 2, 2007 7:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wilkerson is gone today
I guess one of Adam favs will be released today..
If Sosa stay put and Botts is called today...
bye bye Wilkerson.
by engelsol on Aug 1, 2007 10:59 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
We can only hope
by DJCahill on Aug 1, 2007 11:06 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
New prospects
by mtex on Aug 1, 2007 11:06 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
thumbing your nose at $140 million?
by SteveP on Aug 1, 2007 11:08 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
A thought
I know that's borderline conspiracy theory, but I'm sure Boras and Teixeira explicity agreed to go to free agency at some point.
Maybe Boras just thanked Hicks and then went ahead and shredded that memo...
Just weird that Teixeira made no acknowledgment of it.
by hightowersmith on Aug 1, 2007 11:11 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
in his mind
by ab03 on Aug 1, 2007 11:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would think
by SteveP on Aug 1, 2007 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
lebreton
"If Teixeira was truly worth the 10-year, $200-plus million contract that he apparently wants, the Rangers wouldn't have finished in third and fourth place in every season that he was with the club."
...is one of the dumbest statements ever written.
by Brian Hayes on Aug 1, 2007 1:24 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
ARod
Teixeira isn't worth that money, but the Rangers losing isn't why. This isn't basketball - one star does not a playoff team make.
by JBImaknee on Aug 1, 2007 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Look at this smile...
by JBImaknee on Aug 1, 2007 1:29 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Are people surprised
by DJCahill on Aug 1, 2007 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Section by Section
Rosenthal: Maybe if Rosenthal and others would shut up about the way Hicks spends his money then Hicks would shut up as well. This is a problem I see in our culture. It is always the guy that is trying to defend himself that get rips to shreds for opening his mouth. The media should comment on how Hicks spends the teams money, but Hicks should be able to defend his actions without being told to shut up. If Teixeira had not falsely accused the Rangers of not trying to resign him then I doubt Hicks would have ever said something. If the offer was so ridiculous, then Teixeira would have said, "Yeah they made me an offer, but it was only 140 mil for 8 years. That's not even close, so I ended negotiations." He didn't, however, because he would have looked like an ass (pardon the language). So he told a bold face lie. Hicks called him out on it, after he was traded.
LeBreton Section: I think he is right on except for one thing. This statement, "Teixeira isn't as good as first basemen Albert Pujols, Ryan Howard, Prince Fielder, Derek Lee, Lance Berkman or even Carlos Delgado," ignores two important details. First off it ignores the defensive skills of the players. Defensive only, I would put Teixeira at the top of the list. The other detail that he has ignored is the difference in pitching between the two leagues. I couldn't find current interleague statistics (I would love a link if you got one), but I think Teixeira could rank higher than all of those guys except Pujols given a full season against the weak national league pitching. As for overall, I would put Teixeira in the second or third spot on this list.
by kwellborn on Aug 1, 2007 2:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
interleague
.265/.341/.568
but almost 1/3 of those games are against Houston:
.309/.387/.638
probably not all that important considering that it's about 50 ABs a year against unfamiliar pitchers.
by Randy Richardson on Aug 1, 2007 4:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just curious...
by Hove on Aug 1, 2007 3:08 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Warning
Don't forget how the last big name Boras client treated the Astros - Carlos Beltran.
It's fairly obvious by now that Teixeira didn't intend to call Arlington his permanent home. All he would have done is used them for leverage against a Brand Name club back east after the arbitration deadline, thus torpedoing Texas's chances to even pick up some quality draft picks out of it.
Just like Carlos Beltran did.
by pel on Aug 1, 2007 3:29 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks, though
That's pretty cool.
by pel on Aug 1, 2007 3:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















