So, nothing new on ownership, but Murray Chass has an angry ranting post up about prospective owner Dennis Gilbert.
Meanwhile, Evan Grant, offering his comments on the Chass piece, makes a good point...Gilbert is a SoCal guy who, according to Grant, wants to own the Dodgers. The McCourt divorce situation makes it more likely that the Dodgers could end up on the market. Would it really make sense for Gilbert to buy the Rangers (and for MLB to approve Gilbert) if shortly thereafter he's going to want to divest himself of the Rangers so he can go after the Dodgers?