clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

FanPulse: Fans weigh in on alternate scheduling plans

New, 1 comment

The FanPulse poll this week asked about fans’ feelings on various alternatives to the regular MLB schedule to try to get baseball in this year

Chicago Cubs v Texas Rangers Photo by Ralph Freso/Getty Images

Welcome to SB Nation FanPulse, a survey of fans across MLB. Each week, we send out questions to the most plugged in Rangers fans, and fans across the country. Sign up HERE to join FanPulse.

Fans are against total overhaul of 2020 season structure

Last week, baseball fans across the country came out in favor of neutral site baseball games potentially throughout the postseason. They were also in favor of at least some regular season games at neutral sites.

However, this week fans made it abundantly clear that doesn’t mean they want that to be a season-long decision.

According to this week’s SB Nation FanPulse survey, 60 percent of fans are against playing an entire season in Arizona. That plan had been floated by baseball earlier in the month as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

A similar plan was reported that would send every MLB team to their spring training facilities for the duration of the 2020 season. To do this, the leagues and conferences would need to be completely redrawn. National and American League teams would be mixed together based on their spring training location and proximity.

While, technically, this would give each team their own “home field” fans still don’t like the idea. Roughly 55 percent of fans nationally said they would be against this plan as well.

While Rangers fans specifically agree that the entire season shouldn’t be played in Arizona, they do go against the vote of the rest of the country and voted in favor of using spring training divisions for 2020.

Contracts without baseball

Baseball has more to figure out than just what to do with the 2020 season. Last month the MLBPA and owners tentatively agreed that active players will receive a year of service time whatever the length of the season.

However, the deal has not been agreed to and does not address what would happen if the entire season is canceled. Most players, while not all, argue that they should not be forced to remain under contract for an additional year even if games aren’t played. Owners will argue that the season should count more than the year.

Fans, it appears, agree with the owners.

Some contracts are more directly affected by this decision than others, specifically, one-year deals. Theoretically, a team could miss out on seeing any actual in-game action from a player on a one-year deal. Or, in the case of the Dodgers and Mookie Betts, they could have made a trade for an expiring contract and not see that player in a single regular season game.

If that is the case, fans are in favor of teams getting some sort of compensation.

Like the previous question, Rangers fans responded differently than the rest of the country in regards to service time and team compensation. The Rangers fanbase voted 52 percent that teams should not receive any compensation for one-year deals. They also had a majority vote that regardless of any games being played, 2020 should count towards a player’s service time.

How that compensation would work could get messy. It seems unrealistic to just “undo” a trade like the Betts deal. It feels more likely that teams like the Dodgers could be given additional draft picks.

Speaking of draft picks, make sure you’re signed up to receive each week’s FanPulse survey. Next week will directly address the oddities around this year’s draft.